Home
Rhyme of the Day - Biden and Palin Mix It Up [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
john_j_enright

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Links
[Links:| READY OR NOT Touched By Its Rays Instapundit Objectivist Discussion Chicago Objectivist Center DayByDay Peter Saint-Andre Admirers of Ayn Rand at the Atlasphere Fountainhead Institute RIFI UnholyQuest Stephen Hicks Not PC Try Reason Liberating Education - Marsha Enright ]

Biden and Palin Mix It Up [Oct. 2nd, 2008|10:16 pm]
Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
I sat through the whole debate, which is unusual for me.  I haven't listened to any pundits yet, but I thought the moderator seemed evenhanded, and I got the feeling the 2 candidates actually liked each other, which was a very strange development!

Of course, they both skipped all over the place, dodged questions, diverted attention, and came back over and over to their standard talking points. I think she attacked greed more than he did.

What exactly distinguishes greed
from a normal desire to succeed?

Do they think that greed is simply wanting too much?  Or do they think that greed is pursuit of wealth in reprehensible ways?  Those are very different ideas.  I think they get run together a lot.

I was really watching for big major mistakes from the VP candidates. I expected them to stumble. They were certainly awkward at times. But they came across as surprisingly normal to me and I don't know what to make of it. Maybe I'm getting excessively tolerant.

I didn't detect major gaffes
of the type that invite outright laughs.
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: [info]level_head
2008-10-03 03:56 am (UTC)

(Link)

Senator Biden's denial of his impassioned Iraq support was surprising.

Also, his pro-war stance -- he seems ready to send troops anywhere as long as it isn't Iraq -- would seem to disappoint anti-war voters who are paying attention. How many days does he think we'd be in the Sudan? Al Qaeda will move in the moment we announce that we're serious about that place.

It WAS al Qaeda's base for years.

===|==============/ Level Head
[User Picture]From: [info]john_j_enright
2008-10-03 04:02 am (UTC)

(Link)

Yes, I agree. And I think he had some other stumbles of fact, too. I actually think Palin did better than he, especially considering the very low expectations that had been set for her.
[User Picture]From: [info]miss_breeziness
2008-10-03 05:18 am (UTC)

(Link)

"What exactly distinguishes greed
from a normal desire to succeed?"

Very good question. And I hate the way reprehensible greed, ie stepping on people to get what you want and laughing, is run together with just plain old wanting things. Then again, deliberately using words which make people go "grrrr" to describe something actually normal or harmless is a forte of both the left and right. It seems that the left does it more, but that's probably just because there are more writers, reviewers etc on the left.
[User Picture]From: [info]jwhend49
2008-10-04 02:03 am (UTC)

(Link)

The trader who honors the values of partners
Builds upon his own, accumulating wealth with honor.

There is an absence at the heart of true greed
That is the opposite of the desire to succeed.
From: (Anonymous)
2008-10-04 05:59 pm (UTC)

What is greed?

(Link)

Rand called Galt's Gulch a "utopia of greed" in Atlas Shrugged, but I think that was one of her tactical mistakes; greed happens all the time and it's not a good thing.

It seems to me that a valid Objectivist definition of greed would be something like "seeking a value out of context."

Often the context which gets dropped includes things like the importance of honesty, rationality, or respecting the rights of other people.

It seems clear to me that the current financial crisis is the result of greed -- but the greed of politicians, for the most part, rather than Wall Street.

Politicians like Barney Frank and Chris Dodd have been greedy by claiming, in effect, things like:

1. that the actuarial tables used in the mortgage industry could be safely ignored in favor of bleeding-heart social engineering programs (ignoring the importance of rationality)

2. that they are not responsible for creating the crisis, even though they created the subprime mortgage crisis and were responsible for oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (ignoring the importance of honesty)

3. that American taxpayers should bear financial responsibility for the crisis they created (ignoring the rights of other people)

In such cases, politicians are seeking a value (political power, promoting a social agenda, saving face) while dropping the relevant context.

That sure looks to me like greed, and I would expect most Objectivists to agree.
From: (Anonymous)
2008-10-05 06:19 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

Politicians behaved very irresponsibly in this mess. Some of them never met a context they couldn't drop.
[User Picture]From: [info]john_j_enright
2008-10-05 06:20 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

oops. That was me.
[User Picture]From: [info]burntbythesun02
2008-10-05 09:22 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

What word would you use for the desire to acquire material values in a productive manner?
[User Picture]From: [info]john_j_enright
2008-10-05 03:41 pm (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

If only we had a reliable word for this! It would be a different culture.
From: (Anonymous)
2008-10-20 03:04 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

"What word would you use for the desire to acquire material values in a productive manner?"

Ambition. Drive. Aspiration. Motivation. Enterprise. Entrepreneurship.

All of these have healthy connotations, most of the time.

Greed, in contrast, has a connotation of hurting other people, being unprincipled, and losing a sense of integration or balance.
[User Picture]From: [info]mudita
2008-10-20 03:05 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

Oops, that was me. Sorry.
[User Picture]From: [info]john_j_enright
2008-10-20 03:28 am (UTC)

Re: What is greed?

(Link)

It had to be you!

Or at least I figured it was. :)